Your web-browser is very outdated, and as such, this website may not display properly. Please consider upgrading to a modern, faster and more secure browser. Click here to do so.

wnyc:
A former Rugrats animator (and present-day Studio 360 staffer) got sick of seeing the internet mock-up modern-day versions of the kids (the first two images), so he went and did it himself (the third image).
Read his rant:hahahahahah
I hhhhate the ‘trendy reimagining’ shit fanartists keep doing. like I understand creative liberties but jfc at least pretend to know the characters instead of copying fashion magazine shit and pretending it’s them. the fact it’s irritating people who actually worked on those shows tells you something lol.
The dude who “who actually worked on those shows” had to be told to credit the fanartists they decided to drag in the mud. And now those same people are getting harassed because of this person being a dick. Like holy shit these characters were babies for fuck’s sake. Did you define who you were when you were 1?
Not only that, this asshole couldn’t be bothered not being lazy with the redesigns either.

Tommy looks EXACTLY like his dad even though even in all grown up we know he takes more like his mom(Especially the nose). Same with Angelica being a clone of her mom.
Chuckie is wearing the same shit he was wearing when he was a couple years old, he’s just stretched.
Dil has what looks like a cassette player, but considering mp3 players got popular starting in 2001 and this person is stuck in the 90s, he ended up accidentally making Dil looking like a ‘hipster.’
Don’t even get me started on Kimi’s bullshit design.
And at least the fanartists weren’t afraid to let Suzie have a more natural hairstyle. (And holy shit those color choices are fucking awful on her)
So the fact they’re going one how this is more “correct” is stupid.
People can change when they grow up. Some kids lose freckles when they get older, some kids have thier hair change when they get older (My hair was more gold brown when I was younger but turned darker when I got older). Some kids that were brats as kids grow up into humbled adults (like a neighbor I grew up with). So there are a ton of ways people can interpret these characters, there is no one correct way.
So no, I don’t think artists drawing characters as adults with vastly different interpretations is wrong, nor do I think its right to slam them for not drawing them in the show’s exact style. I do however think someone who’s been in the industry could have definitely worded themselves better without shitting on other artists in the process.
wnyc:
A former Rugrats animator (and present-day Studio 360 staffer) got sick of seeing the internet mock-up modern-day versions of the kids (the first two images), so he went and did it himself (the third image).
Read his rant:” Full disclosure: I have something at stake here. I worked as a storyboard artist for the animation studio Klasky Csupo from 1999 to 2002, drawing “The Rugrats,” “The Wild Thornberrys,” “Rocket Power,” and the woefully underrated gem “As Told By Ginger.”
What’s at stake? Have you hired any of these artists to work on a variation of Rugrats?
The artists cited here grew up as fans of the show and felt like spending some time “fondly remembering” (the reprehensible behavior of ours you cited) the cartoon we liked so much by reinterpreting it through our own artistic lens. Me? I like fashion illustration. That’s what I like to do for fun. I didn’t ask Huffington Post, Buzzfeed, Nylon, The Guardian, etc. to pick up my drawings and I certainly didn’t show up at your door and demand you accept my little drawings as your new look. What I drew resonated with people my age and I think that’s nice (the stories I came up with resonated as well, like how I imagined Chucky overcoming anxiety and depression through the art of slam poetry, but i guess to you that gets categorized as “self-confident hipsters” and I guess being self confident is bad??). What you worked on resonated with people, as evidenced by all the fan art and fond re-imaginings. I guess, though, that pisses you off? This rant operates as though we’ve all been hired by a studio to design and animate a new Rugrats show but you need to step back and see that this whole thing boils down to you being mad that young people on the internet had fun appreciating something you worked on decades ago. How terrible.
Do you need to be coddled right now? Do I need to remind you there are seasons and seasons of the show you worked on? Funded by major animation studios? And movies? And spin off series? With tons of merchandise? And my drawings are like, “let’s spend a few minutes looking at what the Rugrats characters might look like if they were young people out walking in the streets.” Does that make you feel better?
So throwing a temper tantrum and publicly blasting fans of a cartoon you worked on is your mode of operation. Okay. If it interests you to know how others respond I’m happy to share that Matt Groening, the creator of The Simpsons, is the one who saw my little grown up drawings and liked them enough to show them to Craig Bartlett, the creator of Hey Arnold. He sent me a really nice message saying he loved the drawings and was so pleased to see young fans grow up to carry on the love for the characters in their own way. I mean, you do you, but maybe consider protecting the legacy of your work by not bitterly picking on young people who do things for fun online.
I drew the second image three years ago because I wanted to draw them my age, as if they were growing up with me. I wasn’t harming anyones career, and I wasn’t redrawing them to take a shot at the original character design artists.
It’s weird to see a “professional” artist call out other artists on fanart designs… I also don’t appreciate my work being put up on a public site without my consent or knowledge for the purpose of bias criticism.
To my followers: Please always encourage your fellow artists to explore new ideas and have fun. Head cannons and AU’s are one of my favorite things and I really love seeing them. You’re allowed to want a character to be relatable to you, it doesn’t hurt cannon to dream. Artists who can’t entertain new ideas will have a tough time improving, so please keep an open mind and consider new possibilities!
I’m inspired to draw new Rugrats fanart, and I encourage anyone else interested to do the same! : ]
Ugh the article is them also whining that they people didn’t draw it show style? Who the fuck cares?

These look more like shitty parody drawings anyways. Like from someone who’s trapped in the 90s(Nice walkman/giant headphones Dil. Kinda “hipster” tho huh? :) ). That and most people don’t stay carbon elongated copies of themselves as babies(psure Chuckie might wear different shit by now) or just copies of what their parents were (Yeah Tommy got some genes from his mom too of did you forget? Specially in the nose).
Seriously if the passive aggressive shot at fanartists wasn’t enough to piss me off, these sheer fucking laziness to the “correct” way to fanart is worse.